gmail – Parerga und Paralipomena http://www.michelepasin.org/blog At the core of all well-founded belief lies belief that is unfounded - Wittgenstein Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:36:30 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.11 13825966 Gmail labels sorting order http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2010/10/15/gmail-labels-sorting-order/ http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2010/10/15/gmail-labels-sorting-order/#comments Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:36:30 +0000 http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/?p=946 Gmail’s labels are great for they let you organize your constantly growing mailbox in a non-final way. That is, using the ‘tagging’ concept, you can assign the same tag to multiple items, or different tags to the same items, add/remove tags etc etc. All of this is well known and documented. One thing though still surprises me. Why the heck can’t we set the labels’ order arbitrarily? (now they are automatically sorted alphabetically).

I have dozens of labels, and know the too-many-emails problem has just moved one level up: too many labels, don’t remember why I’ve created them and what their intended use was. As a result, I end up losing a lot of time just figuring out where things are in my mailbox…

So being able to sort them arbitrarily could be handy here… I did a bit of research online and it looks like this is not possible. Mmmm funny init? Insurmountable technical difficulty? Trivial interaction-design mistake? Who knows. So it looks like as the only workaround to manage gmail labels is to prefix them using alphabetical characters. As simple as that.

By the way, the ‘alphabetical’ ordering used by gmail is not what you might be used to, but the one below:

Screen shot 2010-10-15 at 11.35.12.png

]]>
http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2010/10/15/gmail-labels-sorting-order/feed/ 1 946
MacFUse – Gmail-gigs on the desktop http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2007/01/17/macfuse-gmail-gigs-on-the-desktop/ http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2007/01/17/macfuse-gmail-gigs-on-the-desktop/#comments Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:30:48 +0000 http://people.kmi.open.ac.uk/mikele/blog/?p=190 Got this news from here :

FUSE stands for Filesystem in USErland, and it provides a generic interface that lets the operating system see virtually anything as a filesystem. Historically, adding new filesystem recognition to an operating system has meant modifying the kernel for each new FS. FUSE, though, provides a single interface that filesystem modules use to interface with the OS. Best of all, anything that provides the correct interface can be interpreted as a filesystem. One enterprising Python programmer even developed a script to let users mount their GMail accounts and use the extra space in their accounts to save files.

]]>
http://www.michelepasin.org/blog/2007/01/17/macfuse-gmail-gigs-on-the-desktop/feed/ 2 190